The Preclinical Bottleneck
Traditional preclinical systems, like 2D cell lines or animal models, often fall short when evaluating new therapies. They can’t recapitulate the complexity of human tissues, immune interactions, or patient variability. This is especially problematic for cell therapies, biologics, or immune-targeting drugs, where outcomes depend heavily on dynamic, multicellular interactions.
Even newer tools like epithelial-only organoids, though more advanced than 2D cultures, remain reductionist. By isolating the epithelial compartment from stromal and immune influences, they miss critical microenvironmental signals that shape disease progression, therapeutic response, and tissue remodeling. Artificial co-culture methods attempt to reintroduce these elements, but they rarely mimic how such compartments self-organize in vivo. The result is a system that may contain the “right” cell types but lacks the emergent spatial structure and signaling dynamics necessary to model disease accurately.
Modern pipelines need more than simplified systems. They require predictive platforms that reflect:
• Tissue-specific architecture and signaling
• Disease heterogeneity across patients
• Dynamic microenvironment interactions including immune responses

(a) Schematic overview of the OD transplantation procedure into the omentum of NSG mice, followed by tissue harvest at 8 weeks. (b) H&E staining shows organized columnar epithelium in NODs and disorganized, stratified epithelium in IBODs. (c) Quantification of epithelial architecture confirms increased pseudo-stratified and stratified epithelium in IBODs. (d1–d2) Ki67 staining reveals restricted basal proliferation in NODs and diffuse epithelial proliferation in IBODs. (e) Ki67+ cell quantification shows significantly elevated proliferation in IBODs. (f1–f2) AB-PAS staining demonstrates preserved goblet cells and mucin secretion in NODs, and goblet cell depletion with reduced acidic mucin in IBODs. (g) Goblet cell count is significantly reduced in IBODs. (h1–h2) IHC for Chromogranin A highlights expanded enteroendocrine cell populations in IBODs. (i) Quantification of Chromogranin A+ cells confirms a significant increase in IBODs. (j1–j2) CD4 staining shows T cell presence in IBODs but not in NODs. (k) CD4+ cell quantification confirms increased infiltration in IBODs. (l1–l2) MPO staining indicates neutrophil enrichment in IBOD stroma. (m) MPO+ cells are significantly increased in IBODs. (n1–n2) CD14 staining reveals monocyte/macrophage accumulation in IBODs. (o) CD14+ cell quantification shows significantly elevated levels in IBODs. Scale bar, 40 μm. n = 3 each. For all comparisons, the unpaired, non-parametric two-sided Mann–Whitney U test was used. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001.
Quantification of epithelial morphology confirmed a significantly higher proportion of non-columnar (stratified and pseudostratified) epithelium in IBODs compared to NODs, consistent with remodeling associated with epithelial wounding and regeneration [2].
Immunohistochemical staining for Ki67, a proliferation marker, showed basal localization in NODs, reflecting the normal proliferative gradient in colonic epithelium. In contrast, IBODs exhibited widespread Ki67 expressions throughout the epithelial compartment, mirroring the hyperproliferative state seen in inflamed IBD tissues [3,4]. This proliferation pattern supports the presence of ongoing epithelial turnover and regeneration driven by chronic inflammation.
Functional mucus production also diverged between models. Alcian blue–periodic acid–Schiff (AB-PAS) staining revealed that NODs retained both acidic and neutral mucin production and a stable goblet cell population. IBODs, however, showed a marked depletion of goblet cells and reduced acidic mucin secretion, closely mimicking the mucus barrier defects observed in IBD patients [5,6]. In addition, IBODs exhibited a significantly higher number and broader distribution of chromogranin A–positive enteroendocrine cells than NODs. These specialized secretory cells are known to be dysregulated in IBD and play a key role in sensing and responding to changes in luminal content [7].
Immunostaining for human immune markers further highlighted the retention of disease-relevant immune activity in IBODs. Compared to NODs, IBODs showed strong expression of CD4 (helper T cells), MPO (neutrophils), and CD14 (monocytes/macrophages) in the stromal compartment. These markers were absent in NODs, confirming the immune-rich, pro-inflammatory state specific to IBD-derived tissue.
Together, these findings demonstrate that CaleoBio’s OD models preserve the in-vivo phenotype of their tissue of origin, including structural organization, cell composition, immune activity, and disease-relevant functional outputs. This stability post-transplantation reinforces the utility of ODs for modeling complex tissue interactions, chronic inflammation, and therapeutic response in both healthy and diseased states.
References
- Pai RK, Jairath V, Gutierrez A, et al. Histological criteria for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease: a joint ECCO and ESP consensus statement. J Crohns Colitis. 2021.
- Wu XR, Lai Y, Chen L, et al. Histological features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and their significance in diagnosis and disease assessment. Dig Med Res. 2022.
- Wong NA, Mayer NJ, MacKell S, Gilmour HM. Immunohistochemical assessment of Ki67 and p53 expression assists the diagnosis and grading of ulcerative colitis-related dysplasia. Histopathology. 2000.
- Clausen OP, Rognum TO, Brandtzaeg P. Ki-67: a useful marker for the evaluation of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. J Clin Pathol. 1996.
- Johansson ME, Phillipson M, Petersson J, et al. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. PNAS. 2008.
- Dorofeyev AE, Vasilenko IV, Rassokhina OA, Kondratiuk RB. Mucosal barrier in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013.
- Di Sabatino A, Ciccocioppo R, Morera R, et al. Role of the epithelium in IBD. World J Gastroenterol. 2012.